Private Japanese Lander Crashes on the Moon in Second Attempt Failure
A major disappointment for private space exploration came to Japan’s ispace with its second failed consecutive attempt to send a spacecraft to the Moon. Japan’s ispace lost contact moments before its planned landing on June 5, 2025, as an unmanned lander called Resilience crashed into the Moon. The event highlights the huge challenges that face private players in pursuing space exploration.
Mission Overview: Hakuto-R Mission 2
Resilience was included in ispace’s Hakuto-R Mission 2, which was launched on January 15, 2025, aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Kennedy Space Center. The mission was to land softly in the Moon’s Mare Frigoris, which is a relatively new region in the lunar northern hemisphere. The lander had a number of payloads on board, such as the European-made rover Tenacious, intended to perform scientific experiments and gather samples of lunar dirt. The mission also had a symbolic artwork in it, the Moonhouse, a small red house created by Swedish artist Mikael Genberg .
Descent and Communication Loss

The descent sequence went according to plan until about a minute and 45 seconds short of the planned landing time. Mission control then lost all Resilience telemetry data. Initial observation indicates a failure of the lander’s laser altimeter system, which apparently made it overestimate its height and plummet too fast, leading to a hard landing.
Payload Significance
The payloads of the mission were of great scientific and symbolic importance. Tenacious, the rover built by Europe, carried instruments to study lunar regolith and determine the viability of in-situ resource utilization, e.g., oxygen and hydrogen production from materials available on the Moon. The Moonhouse art installation was intended to inspire and symbolize humanity’s creativity and presence on the Moon .
Financial and Corporate Impact
After the release of the mission failure announcement, the stock of ispace took a substantial hit, as shares fell by 29%. This notwithstanding financial loss, Chief Financial Officer Jumpei Nozaki confirmed investors that the company is financially sound and dedicated to its long-term objective of lunar exploration and settlement.
Comparative Context: Government vs. Private Missions

The ispace challenges underscore the general struggles of private firms in space exploration. While government space agencies such as NASA, Roscosmos, CNSA, and ISRO have successfully landed on the Moon, private firms are yet to tackle such missions’ complexities. Of particular note is Japan’s space organization JAXA, which successfully landed its SLIM lander on the Moon in 2024, proving the competence of state-backed missions .
Future Prospects for ispace
In spite of back-to-back failures, ispace is steadfast in its quest for lunar missions. Six additional missions through 2029 have been planned by the company, ranging from the landing of a large lander co-developed with NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services program to two sample return missions. These future missions are envisioned to make lunar exploration sustainable by 2040 as a long-term goal of ispace.
Conclusion
Resilience’s crash is a sobering experience in the history of private lunar missions. Although the failure of the mission highlights the natural risks and challenges in space missions, it can also be learned from. With stakeholders’ continued support and determination to innovate, ispace and other private industry players can further develop their technologies and approaches and, in doing so, advance the overall idea of sustainable lunar missions.
FAQs
- Why did the Resilience lander crash?
- Initial assessment points to a failure of the laser altimeter system, resulting in an incorrect altitude estimate and a hard landing.
- What was the mission goal of Hakuto-R Mission 2?
- The mission tried to land softly on the Mare Frigoris area of the Moon and launch scientific payloads, such as the Tenacious rover and the Moonhouse art installation.
- How does this failure affect ispace’s future missions?
- Regardless of the failure, ispace intends to continue with six additional missions by 2029, with an emphasis on creating bigger landers and working with NASA lunar programs.
- How did the public and investors react to the mission’s failure?
- The company’s stock dropped by 29% following the announcement, but ispace’s CFO stated that the company remains financially stable.
- What distinguishes government space missions from private ones?
- Government missions generally possess larger resources and experience, resulting in greater success rates, while private missions are continually working on establishing the technologies and skills required for successful space exploration.